Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Munity for poor methodology, including not submitting to subscription journals for

In actual fact, Bohannon admitted, ``Some open-access journals that have been criticized for poor high quality handle supplied by far the most rigorous peer assessment of all''. He cites PLOS A single as an example, saying it was the only journal to raise ethical issues with his submitted operate (Bohannon, 2013). Subscription journals haven't been immune to problems with peer review. In 2014, Springer and IEEE retracted over one hundred published fake articles from numerous subscription journals (Van Noorden, 2014; Springer, 2014). Poor editorial practices at one SAGE journal opened the door to peer review fraud that ultimately led 60 articles to become retracted (Bohannon, 2014; Journal of Vibration and Handle, 10508619.2011.638589 2014). Comparable issues in other subscription journals havebeen documented by Retraction Watch (Oransky and Marcus, 2016). Difficulties with peer overview hence clearly exist, but aren't exclusive to OA journals. Indeed, large-scale empirical analyses indicate that the reliability of your conventional peer assessment method itself leaves significantly to become desired. Bornmann and colleagues reviewed 48 studies of inter-reviewer agreement and found that the average amount of agreement was low (imply ICC of .34 and Cohen's kappa of .17) ?properly beneath what what will be viewed as adequate in psychometrics or other fields focused on quantitative assessment (Bornmann et al., 1049732312450320 2010). Opening up peer review, including allowing for real-time discussions among authors and reviewers, could enable address a few of these concerns. Over time, we expect that transparency will aid dispel the myth of poor peer critique at OA journals, as researchers read critiques and confirm that the procedure is ordinarily as rigorous as that of subscription journals. Authors can use open reviews to demonstrate to academic committees the rigorousness with the peer overview procedure in venues where they publish, and highlight reviewer comments around the importance of their perform. Researchers in their capacity as reviewers can also advantage from an open strategy, as this enables them to have credit for this beneficial service. Platforms like Publons let researchers create reviewer profiles to showcase their function (Publons, 2016).Publish where you desire and archive openlySome researchers may not see publishing in OA journals as a viable alternative, and may possibly wish as an alternative to publish in specific subscription journals seen as prestigious in their field. Importantly, you'll find approaches to openly share perform while still publishing in subscription journals. Preprints: Authors may possibly give open access to their LMI070 papers by posting them as preprints prior to formal peer evaluation and journal publication. Preprints servers are each no cost for authors to post and absolutely free for readers. A number of archival preprint servers exist covering various subject areas (Table 1). (Note: The list in Table 1 isn't all-inclusive; there are plenty of other servers and institutional repositories that also accept preprints). Many journals permit posting of preprints, which includes Science, Nature, and PNAS, as well as most OA journals. Journal preprint policies can be checked by way of Wikipedia (Wikipedia, 2016) and SHERPA/RoMEO (SHERPA/RoMEO, 2016). OfMcKiernan et al. eLife 2016;5:e16800. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.4 ofFeature articlePoint of view How open science assists researchers succeedTable 1. Preprint servers and general repositories accepting preprints.Preprint server or repository* arXiv arxiv.
Sign In or Register to comment.